<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Powered by Blueprint CSS (at least at the time of this writing)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.doycave.com/2008/07/powered-by-blueprint-css-at-least-at-the-time-of-this-writing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.doycave.com/2008/07/powered-by-blueprint-css-at-least-at-the-time-of-this-writing/</link>
	<description>The nine bajillionth blog on the internet...neglected by Doy Cave.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 08:44:22 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.doycave.com/2008/07/powered-by-blueprint-css-at-least-at-the-time-of-this-writing/#comment-102</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 19:26:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doycave.com/?p=147#comment-102</guid>
		<description>I think it's great, too, Carlton, and would be especially helpful on sites where you'll use a LOT of varying layouts inside. Before I knew about it, I came up with my own (not terribly efficient) version for http://www.brownsguide.com , which was going to really need to be flexible. It works for that site, but I think Blueprint is much more scalable.

I looked and couldn't find a "powered by blueprint" button anywhere, not even on the sites of its creators. Guess you can come up with your own if you so desire!

Thanks for the comment!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s great, too, Carlton, and would be especially helpful on sites where you&#8217;ll use a LOT of varying layouts inside. Before I knew about it, I came up with my own (not terribly efficient) version for <a href="http://www.brownsguide.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.brownsguide.com</a> , which was going to really need to be flexible. It works for that site, but I think Blueprint is much more scalable.</p>
<p>I looked and couldn&#8217;t find a &#8220;powered by blueprint&#8221; button anywhere, not even on the sites of its creators. Guess you can come up with your own if you so desire!</p>
<p>Thanks for the comment!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carlton Dickson</title>
		<link>http://www.doycave.com/2008/07/powered-by-blueprint-css-at-least-at-the-time-of-this-writing/#comment-101</link>
		<dc:creator>Carlton Dickson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 19:18:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doycave.com/?p=147#comment-101</guid>
		<description>Blueprint is great, it really speeds up development time once you get to grips with it. I would definitely recommend it for people that spend a lot of time fighting with CSS.

Was just looking for a "powered by blueprint" button for a web site I am working on, don't suppose you know of one do you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blueprint is great, it really speeds up development time once you get to grips with it. I would definitely recommend it for people that spend a lot of time fighting with CSS.</p>
<p>Was just looking for a &#8220;powered by blueprint&#8221; button for a web site I am working on, don&#8217;t suppose you know of one do you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
